<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forte Seems Ready to Be the Starting Back in 08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bearsgab.com/2008/06/15/forte-seems-ready-to-be-the-starting-back-in-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bearsgab.com/2008/06/15/forte-seems-ready-to-be-the-starting-back-in-08/</link>
	<description>The Definitive Chicago Bears Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Loede</title>
		<link>http://www.bearsgab.com/2008/06/15/forte-seems-ready-to-be-the-starting-back-in-08/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Loede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bearsgab.com/?p=447#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>The thing I like about Matt Forte - he&#039;s in excellent shape and although he&#039;s a big back, he still is a quick &#039;n explosive runner.

On the other hand, Benson was a &quot;lazy&quot; out of shape RB right out the gate, who never really was that tough, physical, strong, or fast enough to play the part of a starting back, as a lead go-to #1 guy on offense carrying the football.  I mean, what did he bring to the table and what was his strengths?  Only thing he was consistent at was watching the game on the sidelines after 1 major injury after another.  He heldout forever and never got the respect of his teammates.  He started off on the wrong foot big-time and never displayed strong work ethic or a winner-like mentality in the locker room.  His character/attitude was just too nonchalant.

Forte is a RB who is durable and will impress right away because he&#039;s balanced and fundamentally sound.  I believe he will be able to handle the load and he is a smart runner who has the vision to be an everydown back from what I&#039;ve seen.  A Franchise back along the lines of Larry Johnson?  It also seems to me he&#039;s the anti-Benson - and that&#039;s what we want at RB.  Maybe a more talented and bigger version of Thomas Jones so to say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I like about Matt Forte &#8211; he&#8217;s in excellent shape and although he&#8217;s a big back, he still is a quick &#8216;n explosive runner.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Benson was a &#8220;lazy&#8221; out of shape RB right out the gate, who never really was that tough, physical, strong, or fast enough to play the part of a starting back, as a lead go-to #1 guy on offense carrying the football.  I mean, what did he bring to the table and what was his strengths?  Only thing he was consistent at was watching the game on the sidelines after 1 major injury after another.  He heldout forever and never got the respect of his teammates.  He started off on the wrong foot big-time and never displayed strong work ethic or a winner-like mentality in the locker room.  His character/attitude was just too nonchalant.</p>
<p>Forte is a RB who is durable and will impress right away because he&#8217;s balanced and fundamentally sound.  I believe he will be able to handle the load and he is a smart runner who has the vision to be an everydown back from what I&#8217;ve seen.  A Franchise back along the lines of Larry Johnson?  It also seems to me he&#8217;s the anti-Benson &#8211; and that&#8217;s what we want at RB.  Maybe a more talented and bigger version of Thomas Jones so to say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

